Analisis Bibliometrik Kebijakan Berbasis Bukti dalam Bidang Pendidikan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32781/cakrawala.v17i2.552Keywords:
Kebijakan Berbasis Bukti, Pendidikan, Analisis BibliometrikAbstract
Kebijakan berbasis bukti merupakan bentuk pemanfaatan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi guna mendorong transformasi dan menunjang berbagai kegiatan manusia melalui produk kebijakan.Namun, penggunaan bukti dalam perumusan kebijakan masih menjadi tantangan dalam sektor publik. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengidentifikasi, melihat alur, dan arah penelitian secara terstruktur dalam studi kebijakan berbasis bukti dalam bidang pendidikan yang terbit pada tahun 2013-2022. Menggunakan metode analisis bibliometrik dengan memanfaatkan database jurnal dari Web of Science yang divisualisasikan menggunakan aplikasi VosViewer dan R Biblioshiny untuk menganalisis 158 artikel publikasi yang telah disaring berkaitan dengan kebijakan berbasis bukti dan pendidikan. Penelitian ini menghasilkan temuan bahwa bidang subjek Education Educational Research dan publikasi di dalam Journal Evidence and Policy menjadi sumber referensi utama. Britania Raya dan Australia menjadi negara yang banyak memproduksi dan melakukan menjadi subjekdalam topik kebijakan berbasis bukti dalam bidang pendidikan.
References
Alazmi, A. A., & Alazmi, H. S. (2022). Closing the gap between research and policy-making to better enable effective educational practice: a proposed framework. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 22(1), 91–116. 10.1007/s10671-022-09321-4.
Auld, E., & Morris, P. (2016). PISA, policy and persuasion: translating complex conditions into education ‘best practice.’ Comparative Education, 52(2), 202–229. 10.1080/03050068.2016.1143278.
Cartwright, N. (2019). What is meant by “rigour†in evidence-based educational policy and what’s so good about it? Educational Research and Evaluation, 25(1–2), 63–80. 10.1080/13803611.2019.1617990.
Cartwright, N., Goldfinch, A., & Howick, J. (2009). Evidence-based policy: Where is our theory of evidence? Journal of Children’s Services, 4(4), 6–14. 10.5042/jcs.2010.0017.
Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2016). How Methodological Features Affect Effect Sizes in Education. Educational Researcher, 45(5), 283–292. 10.3102/0013189X16656615.
Hernawan, D., Seran, G. G., Purnamasari, I., Multi, A., Apriliani, A., Publik, S. A., Studi, P., & Komunikasi, S. (2022). Perspektif Kebijakan Berbasis Bukti Terhadap Implementasi Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka Evidence-Based Policy. Jurnal GOVERNANSI, 8(1), 1–10.
Joyce, K. E., & Cartwright, N. (2018). Meeting our standards for educational justice: Doing our best with the evidence. Theory and Research in Education, 16(1), 3–22. 10.1177/1477878518756565.
Knowledge Sector Initiative Indonesia. (2021). Peran Aktif SMERU dalam Mendorong Kebijakan Berbasis Bukti. Knowledge Sector Initiative (KSI). https://www.ksi-indonesia.org/id/wawasan/detail/2481-peran-aktif-smeru-dalam-mendorong-kebijakan-berbasis-bukti.
Kretser, A., Murphy, D., Bertuzzi, S., Abraham, T., Allison, D. B., Boor, K. J., Dwyer, J., Grantham, A., Harris, L. J., Hollander, R., Jacobs-Young, C., Rovito, S., Vafiadis, D., Woteki, C., Wyndham, J., & Yada, R. (2019). Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(2), 327–355.
Lewis, S. (2017). Governing schooling through ‘what works’: the OECD’s PISA for Schools. Journal of Education Policy, 32(3), 281–302.
Lewis, S., & Hogan, A. (2019). Reform first and ask questions later? The implications of (fast) schooling policy and ‘silver bullet’ solutions. Critical Studies in Education, 60(1), 1–18. 10.1080/17508487.2016.1219961.
Lingard, B. (2013). The impact of research on education policy in an era of evidence-based policy. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 113–131. 10.1080/17508487.2013.781515.
Niemann, D., Martens, K., & Teltemann, J. (2017). PISA and its consequences: Shaping education policies through international comparisons. European Journal of Education, 52(2), 175–183.
Parkhurst, J. (2017). Bureaucrats as Evidence Brokers Justin. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 158–160. 10.1093/jopart/mux031.
Pawson, R. (2002). Evidence-based Policy: In Search of a Method. Evaluation, 3890(200204).
Sanderson, I. (2002). Making Sense of ‘What Works’: Evidence Based Policy Making as Instrumental Rationality? Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 61–75. 10.1177/095207670201700305.
Schueler, B. E., Goodman, J. S., & Deming, D. J. (2017). Can States Take Over and Turn Around School Districts? Evidence From Lawrence, Massachusetts. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 311–332. 10.3102/0162373716685824.
Simons, M. (2015). Governing education without reform: the power of the example. Discourse, 36(5), 712–731. 10.1080/01596306.2014.892660.
Stuart, E. A., Bell, S. H., Ebnesajjad, C., Olsen, R. B., & Orr, L. L. (2017). Characteristics of School Districts That Participate in Rigorous National Educational Evaluations. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(1), 168–206. 10.1080/19345747.2016.1205160.
Wyatt, A. (2002). Evidence Based Policy Making: The View From A Centre. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 12–28. 10.1177/095207670201700302.
Young, K., Ashby, D., Boaz, A., & Grayson, L. (2002). Social Science and the Evidence-based Policy Movement. Social Policy and Society, 1(3), 215–224.
Zapp, M., & Powell, J. J. W. (2017). Moving towards Mode 2? Evidence-based policy-making and the changing conditions for educational research in Germany. Science and Public Policy, 44(5), 645–655. 10.1093/scipol/scw091.
