Synergy Development of “State-Representative Apparatus” in Accelerating Social Forestry Policy Outcomes in Ngawi Regency, East Java
(1) Leadership and Policy Innovation Program, The Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta. Ngawi Regency Goverment
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Social forestry is a new approach to solving problems around forests, such as poverty, social inequality, and massive deforestation. Indonesia’s new social forestry policy has given local communities greater rights and legal certainty regarding their involvement in forest management. However, local communities cannot stand alone in their implementation but must collaborate with other relevant stakeholders. A qualitative descriptive approach is used in this paper to capture efforts to build synergies between stakeholders in forest management and empowerment of forest communities in Ngawi Regency and identify opportunities and challenges afterward. The results of our analysis found that the signing of the MoU can be the first step to accelerate the achievement of social forestry policy outcomes. The dichotomy between “forest” and “social” affairs is increasingly visible in the division of tasks of each stakeholder involved. There is a need for clear legal rules regarding the roles and limits of allowable intervention for Regency governments. In addition, an urgent issue that needs to be addressed is the acceleration of capacity building and the capability of local communities, which are identified as essential factors in the success of social forestry policies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adiwibowo, S., Shohibuddin, M., & Kartodiharjo, H. (2013). Kontestasi Devolusi : Ekologi Politik Pengelolaan Hutan Berbasis Masyarakat. In H. Kartodiharjo (Ed.), Kembali ke jalan lurus: kritik penggunaan ilmu dan praktek kehutanan Indonesia (pp. 255–307).
Agusti, T. M., Nurjaya, I. N., & Koeswahyono, I. (2019). Implementasi regulasi perhutanan sosial yang bermanfaat bagi masyarakat sekitar hutan. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(2), 300–309. Retrieved from http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jppk
Arts, B. (2014). Assessing forest governance from a ‘Triple G’ perspective: Government, governance, governmentality. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.05.008
Arts, B., & de Koning, J. (2017). Community Forest Management: An Assessment and Explanation of its Performance Through QCA. World Development, 96, 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.014
Banowati, E., & Prajanti, S. D. W. (2017). Developing the under stand cropping system (PLDT) for sustainable livelihood. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 28(5), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-08-2015-0163
Barr, C. M., Resosudarmo, I. A. P., Dermawan, A., & McCarthy, J. (2006). Decentralization of Forest Administration in Indonesia: Implications for Forest Sustainability, Economic Development, and Community Livelihoods. Retrieved from http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_ files/Books/BBarr0601.pdf
BPS. (2021). Kabupaten Ngawi Dalam Angka 2021. Ngawi: BPS Kabupaten Ngawi.
Cashore, B., Stone, M.W., 2012. Can legality verification rescue global forest governance?. Analyzing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in Southeast Asia. For. Policy Econ. 18, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.005
Chambers, R. (1995). Poverty and livelihoods: Whose reality counts? Environment & Urbanization, 7(1), 173–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789500700106
Djamhuri, T. L. (2012). The effect of incentive structure to community participation in a social forestry program on state forest land in Blora District, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 25, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.02.004
Dressler, W., Büscher, B., Schoon, M., Brockington, D., Hayes, T., Kull, C. A., … Shrestha, K. (2010). From hope to crisis and back again? A critical history of the global CBNRM narrative. Environmental Conservation, 37(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000044
Dunn, W. N. (2003). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Pulblik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Edward Royce. (2018). Poverty and Power : the Problem of Structural Inequality (Third Edit). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Erbaugh, J. T. (2019). Responsibilization and social forestry in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 109(August), 102019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102019
Erbaugh, J. T., & Nurrochmat, D. R. (2019). Paradigm shift and business as usual through policy layering: Forest-related policy change in Indonesia (1999-2016). Land Use Policy, 86(May), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.021
Fisher, M.R., Dhiaulhaq, A., Sahide, M.A.K., 2019. The politics, economies, and ecologies of indonesia’s third generation of social forestry: An introduction to the special section. For. Soc. 3, 152–170. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6348
Fisher, M.R., Moeliono, M., Mulyana, A., Yuliani, E.L., Kamaluddin, Adriadi, A., Judda, J., Sahide, M.A.., 2018. Assessing the New Social Forestry Project in Indonesia : Recognition , Livelihood and Conservation ? Assessing the new social forestry project in Indonesia : recognition , livelihood and conservation ? Int. For. Rev. 20, 346–361.
Galudra, G. (2019). Focusing on facilitation: Issues and challenges of capacity development in Indonesia’S social forestry reforms. Forest and Society, 3(1), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5995
Gelo, D., & Koch, S. F. (2012). Does one size fit all? Heterogeneity in the valuation of community forestry programs. Ecological Economics, 74, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.010
Giessen, L., Krott, M., & Möllmann, T. (2014). Increasing representation of states by utilitarian as compared to environmental bureaucracies in international forest and forest-environmental policy negotiations. Forest Policy and Economics, 38, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.08.008
Gilmour, D. (2016). Forty years of community-based forestry : A review of its extent and effectiveness. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nation.
Krott, M. (2005). Forest Policy Analysis. In Forest Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3485-7
Krott, M. (2008). Forest Government and Forest Governance within a Europe in change. In L. Cesaro, P. Gatto, & D. Pettenella (Eds.), The Multifunctional Role of Forests - Policies , Methods and Case Studies (pp. 13–25). European Forest Institute.
Krott, M., & Hasanagas, N. D. (2006). Measuring bridges between sectors: Causative evaluation of cross-sectorality. Forest Policy and Economics, 8(5), 555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.07.004
Lo, C. (2018). Going from Government to Governance. In M. Bonnafous-Boucher & Y. Pesqueux (Eds.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524224
Maryudi, A. (2012). Restoring State Control Over Forest Resources Through Administrative Procedures: Evidence From a Community Forestry Programme in Central Java, Indonesia. Austrian Journal of South - East Asian Studies, 5(2), 229–242. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4232/10.ASEAS-5.2-3
Maryudi, A., Devkota, R. R., Schusser, C., Yufanyi, C., Salla, M., Aurenhammer, H., … Krott, M. (2012). Back to basics: Considerations in evaluating the outcomes of community forestry. Forest Policy and Economics, 14(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.017
Maryudi, A., & Krott, M. (2012). Poverty Alleviation Efforts through a Community Forestry Program in Java, Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(2), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v5n2p43
Morhart, C. D., Douglas, G. C., Dupraz, C., Graves, A. R., Nahm, M., Paris, P., … Spiecker, H. (2014). Alley coppice-a new system with ancient roots. Annals of Forest Science, 71(5), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0373-5
Nurfatriani, F., Darusman, D., Nurrochmat, D. R., Yustika, A. E., & Muttaqin, M. Z. (2015). Redesigning Indonesian forest fiscal policy to support forest conservation. Forest Policy and Economics, 61, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.07.006
Nurrochmat, D. R., Pribadi, R., Siregar, H., Justianto, A., & Park, M. S. (2021). Transformation of Agro-Forest Management Policy under the Dynamic Circumstances of a Two-Decade Regional Autonomy in Indonesia. Forests, 12(4), 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040419
Osborne, D. T., & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing Government : How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. United Kingdom: Plume.
Ostrom, E., Janssen, M. A., & Anderies, J. M. (2007). Going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15176–15178. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701886104
Peluso, N. L. (2011). Emergent forest and private land regimes in Java. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(4), 811–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.608285
Prabowo, D., Maryudi, A., Imron, M. A., & Senawi. (2016). Enhancing the application of Krott et al.’s (2014) Actor-Centred Power (ACP): The importance of understanding the effect of changes in polity for the measurement of power dynamics over time. Forest Policy and Economics, 62, 184–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.006
Prabowo, D., Maryudi, A., Senawi, & Imron, M. A. (2017). Conversion of forests into oil palm plantations in West Kalimantan, Indonesia: Insights from actors’ power and its dynamics. Forest Policy and Economics, 78, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.004
Pratama, A. A. (2019). Lessons Learned from Social Forestry Policy in Java Forest: Shaping the Way Forward for New Forest Status in ex-Perhutani Forest Area. Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan, 13(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.22146/jik.52092
Pribadi, R., Nurrochmat, D. R., & Suhendang, E. (2020). Enhancing the Role of the District Government in Decentralized Forest Management. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika (Journal of Tropical Forest Management), 26(2), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.26.2.114
Ragandhi, A., Hadna, A. H., Setiadi, S., & Maryudi, A. (2021). Why do greater forest tenure rights not enthuse local communities? An early observation on the new community forestry scheme in state forests in Indonesia. Forest and Society, 5(April), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i1.11723
Rahayu, S., Laraswati, D., Pratama, A. A., Sahide, M. A. K., Permadi, D. B., Wibowo, W., … Maryudi, A. (2020). Bureaucratizing non-government organizations as governmental forest extension services in social forestry policy in Indonesia. Forests Trees and Livelihoods, 29(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2020.1753585
Ramadhan, R., Amalia, R. N., & Wibowo, F. A. C. (2021). Dynamics Of Determining IPHPS And Kulin-Kk In The Perhutani Area (Case Study On Kth Tambak Baya And LMDH Buana Mukti In FMU Garut). Journal of Forestry Research, 4(April), 24–35.
Sahide, M. A. K., Supratman, S., Maryudi, A., Kim, Y.-S., & Giessen, L. (2016). Decentralisation policy as recentralisation strategy: forest management units and community forestry in Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 18(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554816818206168
Schusser, C., Krott, M., Logmani, J., Sadath, N., Movuh, M. C. Y., & Salla, M. (2013). Community Forestry in Germany, a Case Study Seen Through the Lens of the International Model. Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(9), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v6n9p88
Setiahadi, R. (2012). Modal Sosial dalam Pembangunan Kehutanan :Penyelesaian Deforestasi dan Konflik PHBM di Kabupaten Ngawi. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Setiahadi, R., Pratiwi, D., & Ratnaningtyas, D. (2017). Deliberation process analysis of community based forest management policies implementation in Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7(3), 1076–1082. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.7.3.2127
Suharjito, D. (2018). Dramaturgy of agrarian reform in forestry sector in java Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 196(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/196/1/012046
Sunderlin, W. D. (1997). An ex-post methodology for measuring poor people’s participation in social forestry: An example from Java, Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems, 37(3), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005977907533
Vermeulen, S., Nawir, A. A., & Mayers, J. (2008). Rural poverty reduction through business partnerships? Examples of experience from the forestry sector. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(1), 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9035-6
Wahyudi, R., & Wicaksono, R. L. (2020). Policy forum: Village fund for REDD+ in Indonesia: Lessons learned from policy making process at subnational level. Forest Policy and Economics, 119(July), 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102274
Wibowo, A., & Giessen, L. (2015). Absolute and relative power gains among state agencies in forest-related land use politics: The Ministry of Forestry and its competitors in the REDD+ Programme and the One Map Policy in Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 49, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.018
Wulandari, C., Budiono, P., & Ekayani, M. (2019). Impacts of the new Decentralization Law 23/2014 to the implementation of Community Based Forest Management in Lampung Province, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 285(1), 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/285/1/012006
Yokota, Y., Harada, K., Rohman, Silvi, N. O., Wiyono, Tanaka, M., & Inoue, M. (2014). Contributions of Company-Community Forestry Partnerships (PHBM) to the Livelihoods of Participants in Java, Indonesia: A Case Study in Madiun, East Java. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly: JARQ, 48(3), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.48.363
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32781/cakrawala.v15i2.374
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 299 timesPDF - 120 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Cakrawala: Jurnal Litbang Kebijakan
Cakrawala: Jurnal Litbang Kebijakan Abstracted/Indexed by:
Copyright @ 2006, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Provinsi Jawa Timur